Prince Harry was given a 10 percent discount on his legal fees in his High Court battle against the Home Office over his UK security after the Government was punished for delaying the provision of key documents, it has been reported.
The Duke of Sussex took legal action against the Home Office over the February 2020 decision that he should receive a different degree of protection when he returned to the UK after he quit his royal duties.
He lost the case back in February with High Court judge Sir Peter Lane finding that “there has not been any unlawfulness in reaching the decision” to revise his security, adding: “Any departure from the policy was justified. The decision was not irrational. The decision was not marred by procedural unfairness.”
Now new court documents seen by The Times show that Sir Peter has refused Harry permission to appeal and also that the Home Office has been “penalised” for delaying the release of certain information – dubbed “crucial” by Harry’s team – about the workings of Ravec – the committee that arranges security for members of the Royal Family and other VIPs.
According to the newspaper, the Home Office failed to mention three categories of people for whom Ravec provides state protection when it should have legally done so.
The three categories are role-based individuals – like royals – other VIPs and those who need occasional support.
This meant the prince’s legal team had not been made aware of the “other VIP” category, which, according to them, was crucial to his claim.
Harry’s team initially sought “a reduction of 50-60 percent because of the way in which the documents and information were disclosed” by the Home Office.
Sir Lane said that while the Home Office had not acted in bad faith, “the defendant’s breaches are, in all the circumstances, sanctionable”.
However, he refused Harry permission to appeal, according to a document signed last week which was also reportedly seen by the newspaper.
A Home Office spokesman told the Times: “While we are pleased with the decision of the court to refuse permission to appeal, it would be inappropriate to comment further on ongoing legal proceedings”.
Prince Harry’s representatives were contacted for comment.
