Harry expressed concern that his children could not feel secure in the UK if adequate safety measures were not in place.
The Government countered Harry’s claims, advocating for the dismissal of his case, asserting that Ravec, under the purview of the Home Office, was justified in determining that the Duke’s security arrangements should be customised and evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Representatives from the Home Office clarified that while the Duke was no longer subject to regular security reviews by Ravec, he could be included in such evaluations under specific circumstances.
It was emphasised to the court that there was indeed consideration given to the potential impact of security changes, with the tragic death of Princess Diana being referenced as part of the decision-making process.
Ravec has delegated responsibility from the Home Office over the provision of protective security arrangements for members of the royal family and others, with involvement from the Metropolitan Police, the Cabinet Office and the royal household.
DON’T MISS:
Harry vows Charles’s cancer will have ‘unifying effect’ in bombshell interview [INTERVIEW]
Prince Harry discusses officially becoming a US citizen on Good Morning America [COMMENTS]
Prince Harry hits 61mph trying out skeleton bobsled as Meghan Markle watches on [PICTURES]
Among the royal aides on the committee was Sir Edward Young, private secretary to the late Queen Elizabeth.
Harry’s lawyers argued there were tensions between Sir Edward and the duke and as such the royal official should not have been part of the decision-making.
Sir Peter found “there has not been any unlawfulness in reaching the decision” to revise his security, adding: “Any departure from policy was justified. The decision was not irrational. The decision was not marred by procedural unfairness.”
In his 52-page ruling, which was partially redacted, Sir Peter stated that Harry’s lawyers had adopted an “inappropriate, formalist interpretation of the Ravec process.”
“The ‘bespoke’ process devised for the claimant in the decision of 28 February 2020 was, and is, legally sound,” he added.
In February 2020, the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (Ravec), responsible for organising security for members of the Royal Family and other prominent figures, made a significant decision regarding the Duke of Sussex.
