'Insane': FBI Director Christopher Wray tangles with House GOP in tense hearing. What you missed


  • Wray highlighted thousands of investigations into Chinese attempts to steal U.S. secrets.
  • Wray also focused on fighting violent crime and drug trafficking.
  • Republicans and Democrats warned they might not reauthorize a surveillance law because of concerns about illegitimate FBI queries.

WASHINGTON – FBI Director Christopher Wray defended the agency Wednesday against House Republicans who argued it suppressed conservative posts on social media and for running what they called illegal searches about U.S. citizens under a foreign surveillance law.

The hearing became the latest flashpoint for the FBI, which Republicans criticized for investigating participants at school board meetings or censoring social media posts. Democrats accused Republicans of trying to protect former President Donald Trump, who faces federal charges related to possession of national security documents after an FBI search of Mar-a-Lago 18 months after he left the White House. A White House spokesman said Republicans are attacking law enforcement.

In his opening salvo, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, cited a federal court decision in Louisiana eight days earlier that found the government suppressed First Amendment rights of people posting on social media posts about the COVID-19 pandemic vaccines and mask requirements, under a policy the ruling compared to an “Orwellian ministry of truth.”

The ruling found the FBI failed to alert social media companies that a story about Hunter Biden’s laptop was real rather than Russian disinformation days before the 2020 presidential election. Jordan and Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., said that deprived millions of voters of information before the election.

“When the court said the FBI misled, that’s a nice way of saying they lied,” Jordan said.

Wray said he has reviewed the decision and the FBI would comply with the court’s prohibition against influencing social media companies. But he declined to comment further because the case is subject to further litigation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

ESPYs presenter takes jab at Kendall Jenner's 'starting 5' dating history

Next Story

Is Rooney 'Rule' ready for reform? Why ex-NFLPA director says change could take decades.

Latest from News