By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept

Amed Post

Breaking News,magazine, sport, life

Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Reading: Rachel Reeves warned of pension Budget move that would cut take-home pay for ‘millions’ | Personal Finance | Finance
Share
Font ResizerAa

Amed Post

Breaking News,magazine, sport, life

Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Rachel Reeves warned of pension Budget move that would cut take-home pay for ‘millions’ | Personal Finance | Finance

amedpost
Last updated: November 6, 2025 12:04 am
amedpost
Published: November 6, 2025
Share
SHARE


The Chancellor has been urged to avoid a change to pensions contributions in the November Budget, saying it could lead to Brits losing out on millions.

The Society of Pension Professionals (SPP) has written to all Members of Parliament, warning of the dangers in reducing or removing salary sacrifice arrangements for pension contributions. Salary sacrifice for pensions (also known as salary exchange) is an optional arrangement where an employee gives up a portion of their salary in return for their employer contributing an equivalent amount to their pension. Whilst they are funded by the employee, they are treated as employer pension contributions for income tax and National Insurance purposes. A new paper from the SPP said that research commissioned by HMRC has led to speculation that the Government may seek to make savings by abolishing or reforming salary sacrifice for pension contributions. In the run-up to the Budget on November 26, 2025, such speculation has increased. Around a third of private sector employees utilise salary sacrifice arrangements, and almost 10% of public sector workers do so as well.

The SPP stated that any changes would bring upheaval to a large number of workers, with the removal of the arrangement costing “millions” of employees hundreds of pounds per year.

The SPP explained that whilst there is a £4 billion cost to the Government in providing salary sacrifice arrangements (£1.2 billion for employees and £2.9 billion for employers), there is also “widespread recognition that this is a positive investment that incentivises pension saving”.

The research commissioned and published by HMRC demonstrated that employers are generally very supportive of the arrangement and believe that any changes would cause confusion, reduce benefits to employees, and disincentivise pension savings.

The research presented three potential scenarios for restricting salary sacrifice, with employers indicating that in all three scenarios, employee morale was likely to be negatively affected.

Steve Hitchiner, chair of SPP’s Tax Group, said: “Changing salary sacrifice arrangements would lead to a reduction in take-home pay for millions of employees who are saving into a workplace pension, with the greatest impact for those earning less than £50,284 a year.

“It would also represent another sizeable cost to employers, despite the Chancellor’s public commitment against this, and would undermine the critical role that employers play in supporting and promoting good quality pension saving vehicles.”

Giants report card for NFL Week 1: Defense kept Dak Precsott in check
ESPN’s Shams Charania was stopped by Secret Service at MSG
Migrants ‘must be moved’ from Epping hotel as Essex police chief issues warning | UK | News
Rediscovered 1800s sketch set to fetch up to £200,000 at auction | UK | News
Rory McIlroy turns down millions of pounds just days after Ryder Cup glory | Golf | Sport

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© AMED POST Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?