By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept

Amed Post

Breaking News,magazine, sport, life

Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Reading: Lib Dem council spends £13k making bathrooms gender neutral while raising tax | Politics | News
Share
Font ResizerAa

Amed Post

Breaking News,magazine, sport, life

Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Lib Dem council spends £13k making bathrooms gender neutral while raising tax | Politics | News

amedpost
Last updated: April 19, 2025 7:52 am
amedpost
Published: April 19, 2025
Share
SHARE


A Liberal Democrat council spent £13,000 making one toilet block gender neutral, a new report has revealed. As reported by the Telegraph, the toilet block at Latchmere Recreation Ground in south London was modified by Kingston Council.

The council is run by Lib Dem party leader Ed Davey, MP for Kingston and Surbiton. The £13,000 was spent while council taxes had been hiked by 5%. The Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that the definition of a woman is based on biological sex in a significant judgment.

This means transgender women will be barred from female-only spaces such as women’s bathrooms.

However, third spaces can still be created, including unisex changing rooms and bathrooms.

Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Thursday, Equality and Human Rights Commission chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner said: “There isn’t any law saying that you cannot use a neutral third space, and they should be using their powers of advocacy to ask for those third spaces.”

However, Conservative MP Kevin Hollinrake argued the spending required for more of these spaces would be a “flagrant disregard for the priorities of hard-working people.”

As per the MailOnline, he said: “The Liberal Democrat-run Kingston council squandered £13,000 of taxpayers’ money on gender-neutral toilet conversions, all while imposing a five per cent council tax hike, making Kingston the most expensive borough in London.”

While the Supreme Court ruling is significant, it is likely that the debate around gender will continue.

Former Supreme Court judge Jonathan Sumption has warned that many are misinterpreting the ruling, adding that the Supreme Court is not forcing anyone to make single sex spaces.

He said: “That’s the main point, which I think has been misunderstood about this judgment. I think it’s quite important to note that you are allowed to exclude trans women from these facilities. But you are not obliged to do it.

“So, for example, the authorities of a sport such as women’s boxing, women’s football, are allowed to limit it to biological women. They were not in breach of the discrimination rules of the [Equality] Act. But the judgment does not mean that the sporting authorities have got to limit women’s boxing or women’s football to biological women.”

Prominent campaigners in favour of protecting female biological status have welcomed the ruling.

Author JK Rowling celebrated the judgement, saying: “It took three extraordinary, tenacious Scottish women with an army behind them to get this case heard by the Supreme Court.

“I’m so proud to know you.”

M&S issues message to customers as ‘cyber incident’ hits all 1,000 UK stores | UK | News
Trump admin dealt major blow in crusade against Letitia James after court rules top Albany prosecutor wasn’t lawfully appointed
Shock poll shows Reform storming ahead on 29% as Tories drop to FOURTH | Politics | News
Lions erupt in explosive brawl with Australia as players pulled apart | Rugby | Sport
Grand National 2025 jockey riding 25-1 shot but is allergic to horses | Racing | Sport

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© AMED POST Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?