By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept

Amed Post

Breaking News,magazine, sport, life

Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Reading: I didn’t fight for Britain for Keir Starmer to drag UK into an EU Army | Politics | News
Share
Font ResizerAa

Amed Post

Breaking News,magazine, sport, life

Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

I didn’t fight for Britain for Keir Starmer to drag UK into an EU Army | Politics | News

amedpost
Last updated: January 29, 2025 11:46 am
amedpost
Published: January 29, 2025
Share
SHARE


Keir Starmer’s quiet march toward re-ensnaring Britain in the grip of EU bureaucracy is nothing short of a betrayal of everything Brexit stood for.

It is no secret that Keir Starmer has long harboured ambitions for significantly closer ties with the European Union. A staunch Remainer, his vision for Britain seems less like a post-Brexit independence and more like a creeping re-entry into EU structures — not by name, but certainly in practice.

Recent reports surrounding Starmer’s discussions with European leaders highlight a disturbing trajectory: a willingness to entertain the EU’s proposed £420 billion defence pact.

This initiative, spearheaded by Poland and supported by the European Commission, aims to pool resources for a collective European defence effort. While ostensibly addressing pressing threats like Russian aggression, this move veers dangerously close to forming an EU army — something the UK emphatically rejected by Brexit.

Starmer’s cozying up to EU leaders is more than a pragmatic approach to shared security concerns.

It is a thinly veiled attempt to align the UK with European defence ambitions. Despite his denial of plans to create a European army, his actions suggest otherwise. The timing is telling — Starmer’s defence review is delayed, and pressure is mounting to increase military spending amidst a global climate of instability.

With wars in Ukraine and Israel and the looming shadow of Russian aggression, the need for robust defence investment is unquestionable. However, tying the UK’s security strategy to Brussels is not the solution.

This so-called “intergovernmental agreement” is a backdoor mechanism to draw the UK into EU structures. It offers participation to non-EU nations like Britain and Norway while allowing neutral countries such as Ireland to opt out.

This tactical flexibility is designed to entice reluctant players like the UK into an arrangement that reeks of EU centralisation, using Britain’s strained finances as leverage.

Starmer’s willingness to entertain this pact undermines Britain’s hard-won sovereignty. Brexit was a declaration of independence from European bureaucratic overreach, yet here we are, with our Prime Minister holding hands with Donald Tusk, who openly dreams of a “Breturn.”

Tusk’s remarks during their recent press conference — expressing hope for the UK’s eventual return to the EU — should send chills down the spine of anyone who values British independence.

The defence pact’s staggering price tag, overseen by the European Investment Bank, further highlights the folly of this scheme.

The UK has already committed significant resources to NATO and bilateral defence agreements, including £8 billion in Polish defence deals over the past three years.

Why, then, should Britain fund a duplicative EU program that undermines NATO’s primacy and funnels control to Brussels?

Starmer’s actions betray not only British sovereignty but also the trust of our armed forces. His willingness to consider aligning with the EU defence initiative smacks of desperation — a misguided attempt to gain favour with European elites while neglecting the very real needs of Britain’s military.

Increased defence spending is vital, but it must prioritise national interests, not bolster a European army in disguise.

The EU’s defence pact is not about solidarity or security — it is about centralisation. Britain must resist being dragged into this quagmire. Keir Starmer’s ambitions are not only reckless but a betrayal of the Brexit mandate.

Britain’s future lies in global independence, not as a subordinate player in a European superstate.

If Starmer gets his way, Britain will trade its hard-won independence for the shackles of a European superstate — we must stop him before it’s too late.

Richard Thomson was the Reform UK candidate for Braintree in the 2024 General Election

Brady Tkachuk helps USA men’s hockey survive Denmark scare
Why you should do this 1 activity when visiting Canterbury | UK | Travel
Man’s bitter £300k 4-year battle with painter neighbour re 4ft stream | UK | News
Storm maps turn bright red as 88mph winds and 200-mile wall of rain to hit 15 UK cities | Weather | News
Suns’ Dillon Brooks arrested for DUI while rehabbing fractured hand

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© AMED POST Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?