By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept

Amed Post

Breaking News,magazine, sport, life

Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Reading: Drivers ‘presumed liable’ for collisions with cyclists under new rule proposal
Share
Font ResizerAa

Amed Post

Breaking News,magazine, sport, life

Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Drivers ‘presumed liable’ for collisions with cyclists under new rule proposal

amedpost
Last updated: February 14, 2025 5:15 pm
amedpost
Published: February 14, 2025
Share
SHARE


Campaigners are calling for motorists to always be “presumed liable” after collisions with cyclists in a major new rules overhaul. 

A new Parliament petition has called for the changes to “shift the burden of proof”  and allow more vulnerable road users to claim compensation. 

However, it could see motorists be hit with fines, penalty points or worse for causing an accident even if they were not at fault.

Campaigners say that road users would need to “prove” they were innocent to avoid being penalised.

The petition has so far received thousands of signatures with the poll still running until the middle of May.

The petition reads: “Introduce presumed liability for civil cases relating to certain road collisions, to shift the burden of proof.

“It would mean when vulnerable road users, e.g. cyclists & pedestrians, claim against a more powerful road user (a driver), the driver would be presumed liable unless they prove otherwise.

“We think this would compensate vulnerable road users, such as cyclists and pedestrians, more quickly and effectively. 

“Pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders are often unable to obtain compensation because of a lack of adequate evidence. 

“If a vulnerable road user is killed they are not there to give evidence; if they are seriously injured it may be impossible for them to give complete or satisfactory evidence of the circumstances in which they were injured.”

A total of 10,000 signatures are needed for the issue to receive an official Government response.

However, 100,000 are required for the new rule to be considered for debate by MPs in Parliament. 

Experts at Nash&Co Solicitors have previously admitted that “different considerations apply” to accidents involving cars and cyclists. 

They say the law already recognises that cars are likely to do more damage to the cyclist. 

They explained: “It would be an unusual case where a cyclist caused a motorist personal injury. (Unless the motorist collided with another object or vehicle.)

“Therefore, the Law has developed the theory of “causative potency”; what this means is that often the motorist will suffer a greater share of the responsibility for causing the accident than the cyclist even though each party may have been equally blameworthy.”

Chris Pratt, Jason Bateman, Zooey Deschanel watch Lakers vs. Clippers
Sadiq Khan says he is ‘delighted’ after Donald Trump attacks ‘nasty’ Mayor | Politics | News
Manchester synagogue terrorist was reported to police four years ago | UK | News
Yankees’ Aaron Boone is all smiles after 76ers land LeBron James
Russia making mockery of sanctions as ‘Putin has millions of US & EU missile parts’ | World | News

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© AMED POST Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?