By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept

Amed Post

Breaking News,magazine, sport, life

Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Reading: Anyone who bought Apple or Samsung phone in these years could be owed share of £480m | UK | News
Share
Font ResizerAa

Amed Post

Breaking News,magazine, sport, life

Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Anyone who bought Apple or Samsung phone in these years could be owed share of £480m | UK | News

amedpost
Last updated: October 6, 2025 8:31 am
amedpost
Published: October 6, 2025
Share
SHARE


Nearly £30 million people could be entitled to a share of £480 million if they bought an Apple or Samsung smartphone between 2015 and 2024. Consumer group Which? is taking US tech giant Qualcomm to a tribunal today over accusations of anti-competitive practices. Qualcomm has been accused of forcing Apple and Samsung to pay higher prices and licensing fees for essential handset components, thereby increasing the cost of their smartphones. 

If Which? wins, there will be a second stage to get the £480 million from Qualcomm, which would be shared between around 29 million people affected in Britain. This equates to around £17 each for people who bought a Samsung or Apple smartphone between October 1, 2015 and January 9, 2024.

Which? CEO Anabel Hoult said: “This trial is a huge moment. It shows how the power of consumers – backed by Which? – can be used to hold the biggest companies to account if they abuse their dominant position.

“Without Which? bringing this claim on behalf of millions of affected UK consumers, it would simply not be realistic for people to seek damages from the company on an individual basis.

“That’s why it’s so important that consumers can come together and claim the redress they are entitled to.”

Qualcomm, one of the biggest producers of smartphone chips in the world, maintains that the case has “no basis”. 

It is also embroiled in a similar case in Canada, and has already been fined by the EU for antitrust. 

In 2017, it was sued by the Federal Trade Commission for unfair practices due to the way it licensed its technology, but the case was dismissed in 2020.

Klint Kubiak calls Superdome ‘whole new ballgame’
Six Nations get clear verdict on South Africa joining tournament as seventh team | Rugby | Sport
Shoppers to use digital ID to buy booze after major change | Politics | News
Tiny village becoming ‘a ghost town as B&B turned into migrant hotel’ | World | News
Vikings are the favorite at prediction markets

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© AMED POST Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?