Home News NHS hiring nurses for inbred children as Labour declines to ban cousin...

NHS hiring nurses for inbred children as Labour declines to ban cousin marriage | UK | News

0


The NHS has begun hiring midwives and nurses specialising in managing genetic conditions resulting from cousin marriages, with salaries reaching £50,000, as the controversy around such unions resurfaces in Parliament.

These roles, found in trusts across England, aim to address the higher rates of birth defects observed in children born to closely related parents.

The positions involve supporting families with education on genetic risks and advocating for increased genetic testing. MailOnline reported that numerous NHS employers were hiring for the role.

This development occurred when Richard Holden, a Conservative MP, introduced a Private Members’ Bill seeking to ban cousin marriages, citing the associated health risks.

In a Commons debate, Holden highlighted studies showing a twofold increase in birth defects among such unions, including heart conditions, cleft palates, and cystic fibrosis.

However, the Labour Party has refrained from supporting the ban, and some MPs, like Independent Iqbal Mohamed, defended the practice for fostering family bonds despite acknowledging its health implications.

In communities with high prevalence rates, such as those of Pakistani and Bangladeshi heritage, NHS studies report significant risks for children.

Data from Bradford, for example, reveals nearly half of infant deaths were linked to genetic anomalies, and cousin marriages remain a contributing factor.

Genetic literacy projects funded by NHS England, including culturally sensitive counselling, are being implemented in areas with high demand.

Critics of cousin marriages, like Tory MP Neil O’Brien, argue for urgent action, given the severe health outcomes.

Conversely, defenders cite social and cultural norms and challenge comparisons to risks associated with older parenthood in non-related couples.

Holden’s bill faces procedural challenges, with its second reading scheduled for January 17, but it has reignited debates on balancing cultural practices with public health priorities.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here