By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept

Amed Post

Breaking News,magazine, sport, life

Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Reading: I’m a baroness — this is why some House of Lords peers should be sacked | Politics | News
Share
Font ResizerAa

Amed Post

Breaking News,magazine, sport, life

Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

I’m a baroness — this is why some House of Lords peers should be sacked | Politics | News

amedpost
Last updated: April 14, 2025 11:29 am
amedpost
Published: April 14, 2025
Share
SHARE


I’ll be honest: when I first arrived in the House of Lords two years ago, I had more than a few “pinch me” moments. Sitting there, listening to the breadth of wisdom, lived experience, and sheer commitment from across the chamber — I was struck by how much of it came from hereditary peers. Yes, the ones some are so keen to get rid of.

That’s why I’m backing an amendment that gives us a bit of common sense in the midst of all the noise about reform. It’s a simple idea: if a hereditary peer is pulling their weight, showing up, making a difference — let their party nominate them for a life peerage. Keep the contributors. Lose the hangers-on. What’s not to like?

This isn’t about defending privilege. It’s about defending value. We’ve got hereditary peers in this House — from all parties — who’ve dedicated years to getting stuck into real issues. You don’t throw that away just to tick a reform box.

And here’s the bit no one talks about enough: the regions. I’m from Northern Ireland. Too often, voices like mine — and voices from Scotland, Wales, and the North of England — are in short supply in Westminster. That’s a real problem.

Hereditary peers, for all the flak they get, often come from outside the London bubble. They bring different perspectives. Real country knowledge. Ties to communities. That’s gold dust in a chamber like this — and we’d be mad to lose it.

I mentioned Lord Glentoran and Viscount Brookeborough, both from Northern Ireland, who’ve served this House with real distinction. If the hereditary system goes, I want to know party leaders and the appointments commission are going to step up and make sure people from all over the UK are still heard.

Yes, we’re not elected representatives. But that doesn’t mean where we come from doesn’t matter. It does. And the House of Lords should reflect the whole country — not just SW1.

This amendment gives us a way to modernise without wiping the slate clean. It lets us keep the voices that matter, honour experience, and, crucially, protect the diversity — of region, background and outlook — that makes this place work.

I say keep the workers, drop the window dressing. Let’s not reform ourselves into another echo chamber.

BBC survey sees viewers ask it to ‘make programmes less diverse’ | UK | News
Disturbed man dies after allegedly cutting off his penis in bloody DTLA scene
Netflix Adolescence fans ‘didn’t know’ of Stephen Graham’s huge Brad Pitt link | TV & Radio | Showbiz & TV
Roman Reigns, Liv Morgan win
White House meetings on college sports’ money mess to give athletes key role for first time starting this week

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© AMED POST Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?