By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept

Amed Post

Breaking News,magazine, sport, life

Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Reading: Angela Rayner savaged over ‘unfair’ Right to Buy move | Politics | News
Share
Font ResizerAa

Amed Post

Breaking News,magazine, sport, life

Search
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US

Angela Rayner savaged over ‘unfair’ Right to Buy move | Politics | News

amedpost
Last updated: December 27, 2024 5:40 pm
amedpost
Published: December 27, 2024
Share
SHARE


Thousands of council tenants have signed a petition calling on Angela Rayner to scrap her plans to reduce the Right to Buy discount by thousands of pounds.

The deputy PM and secretary of state for housing is a former council house tenant who benefited from being able to buy her council house at a reduced price.

But in October she announced plans to reduce the cap on tenants’ maximum savings from £136,400 to just £38,000.

The announcement came with a deadline of November 21 for hopeful buyers to buy their house at the old, discounted price, meaning many simply did not have enough time to do so.

Right to buy was introduced in the 1980s by Margaret Thatcher and allowed council house tenants to buy their social housing from their local authority if they had lived in it for a minimum of three years.

Ms Rayner benefitted from the scheme in 2007 when she bought her council house in Stockport, Greater Manchester for £79,000 with a 25% discount. She subsequently sold the property and made a profit of £48,500.

The government is also considering plans to raise the time a person must have lived in the house before being able to purchase it, with the potential that this could be increased to 10 years.

A similar increase could be made to the time a buyer has to wait before being able to sell the house after purchase. Currently, if the house is sold within the first five years, some of all of the discount must be repaid.

But the move has sparked anger amongst those aspiring to purchase their council home in the way that Angela Rayner did, with a petition calling for her to reverse her decision being signed by more than 3,000 people.

Julie Padfield was one of the lucky few who managed to purchase her houses before the November deadline and believes that the “unfair” decision is an act of “discrimination” against social tenants.

She told the Telegraph: “Now only being able to buy with such a reduced amount means they [social homes] will be unaffordable for most people.

“Agreements which stipulate a reduction [in the price] for the amount of years you have been a tenant are written into most contracts. They [the Government] should uphold the original agreement, and maybe introduce the reduced reduction for new tenants.

“Although many have bought their council houses, and rightfully too, many have been sold to housing associations and multi-tenancy landlords – something which never seems to get mentioned.”

Currently, the discount available is either 70% of the total value of a home or a maximum figure ranging from £22,000-£38,000 depending on region, with whichever is the lowest value being the one on offer.

RAF jets scrambled to intercept Russian bombers six times | World | News
Local elections LIVE: Reform UK on edge of huge victory as Runcorn ‘too close to call’ | Politics | News
Padres make insane MLB history in sweep over Cubs in wild-card
ERROR: The request could not be satisfied
Kirk Herbstreit tears into Notre Dame for schedule ’embarrassment’

Subscribe

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© AMED POST Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?